Kayla Pfrommer
History of Graphic Design
Discourse 1
2/28/10
ARTICLE 1:Texts on Type Critical Writings on Typography “Designing Hate: Is There a Graphic Language of Vile Emotion?” (pp.42-44) – Steven Heller
Main Points:• Adolf Hitler influenced the design of the Nazi party emblem, the swastika
• Giant sized buildings dwarfed the individual omnipotence of the state in Germany
• The Nazis developed graphics that dehumanized its enemy and promoted hatred
• Most of the design was racist propaganda
• Characterized Jews as vermin
• Nazis masterminded the aesthetics of hatred
• Certain typefaces, such as German Fraktur type, still evokes authority and looks frightening no matter what word is being spelled
• Certain American icons, such as the white hooded robe of the KKK is a living logo that denotes hate
• WAR, the tabloid of the White Aryan Resistance, has a default typeface and column width, but the graphics used in their adds denote hatred
• Burning swastikas, heroic mounted klansmen, and bloody daggers can be understood by any onlooker and the message of hatred is clear
• The design of hate must be painfully obvious so that the message is clear and unmistaken by anyone



The three images that I chose are the Nazi swastika, an example of a German newspaper articles from 1941 that features the typeface Fraktur, and the white hooded robe worn by the Ku Klux Klan. In the article, Heller explains that the display of hatred through graphic design must be completely obvious and unmistaken. In these three visuals that I have chosen, hatred can be denoted easily. The swastika is mentioned throughout the article because of its simplistic and easily recognizable display that denotes hate. The symbol, which is a sign for the SS, is geometric, bold, and is the sign of fear and hate that was especially used in Germany in the 1940’s. Even today this symbol is still one of the most recognizable visual and graphic displays of hatred. The German typeface Fraktur was the typeface used on Nazi signs and newspapers in the 1940’s and the font itself is menacing. Heller mentions that “even the most harmless words and phrases, takes on a decidedly ominous look,” (43) when set in Fraktur. Finally, the white hooded robe worn by the KKK is a symbol in itself. It is a threatening visual and symbolic of the hatred that is cast upon people by the Ku Klux Klan. The robe is easily recognizable by anyone, which makes it a successful denotation of hate through visual terms. All three of these images are examples of designed hate that shows the graphic language of vile emotion.
ARTICLE 2:Texts on Type Critical Writings on Typography “Typographic Heresies: Some Notes on Experimenting With Type” (p. 182) – Eugene M. Ettenberg
Main Points:• Typographic experimentation began with the movements of “Dada” and “Surrealism”
• The Dada painter-designers displayed the same vicious, mock-humor in their visual publications and posters as could be characterized by their pictures, sculpture, poetry, and music
• Dadaists protested against the mediocre, static, devitalized typography stemming from 1916-1922
• Surrealists pictured incongruities, fantasies and distorted perspective to images or collages
• Some Surrealists, such as Kurt Schwitters and Raoul Hausmann made use of typographic fragments
• The teachings of the Bauhaus from 1919-1928 also experimented with typography
• The Bauhaus experimented with new sans serif types such as Futura and insisted on sharp contrast between bold and extra bold faced types combined with text which went against the traditional polite gray pages of the 20’s
• All of these experiments in type have influenced the way typography exists today



The three images that I chose are a poster designed by Dadaists in the 1920’s, a collage by Surrealist Kurt Schwitters, and a poster designed by Jan Tschichold. These three examples show the experimentation with type design and graphic design in the 1920’s. The first image of a Dada collage shows how they scattered type and image on a page in a humorous way. There is no clear message in the poster, which is how the Dadaists worked. The point of their collages was to break the rules for the sake of breaking them. This is clearly embodied in their poster. The collage by Surrealist Kurt Schwitters is an example of how Surrealists worked in the 1920’s. They often used snips of newspapers, railway tickets, photographs, or even trash in their collages. In the article, Ettenberg mentions how certain Surrealists, such as Kurt Schwitters, used typographic fragments in their work. This can be seen in Schwitters’ collage. Finally, the poster designed by Jan Tschichold is a clear example of what the author mentions in the article about the ideas of the Bauhaus. According to Ettenberg, Tschichold was especially known for his use of “asymmetric design, radical use of white space, bold silhouetting of photographs, and substitution of color bands and rules for useless ornament,” (182). These elements can be seen in his poster, especially in the bold silhouettes of photographs he cut out. The color bands and rules used in his poster visually show the guides used in the design. All three of these pieces of art were revolutionary in their time because they broke the rules and because of their bold explorations and experimentations, graphic design has evolved into what it is today.